My Last Ever Post On Work By Borjigin.
I don’t want to spend too long on this as I have already made the key points in the previous post, but I do want to highlight how utterly fallacious Borjigin’s assertions about NDEs are . This link to a video of her reviewing her work was provided by Dave:
The link was accompanied by a question from Dave, which I am sure many lay people would ask after watching this video:
“Borjigin seems to present data that shows the brain activity still continues for minutes after cardiac arrest, not just 30 seconds…. doesn’t her evidence in this talk show that the brain can continue receiving electrical signals for long periods [after CA]?”
Firstly, I do not want to launch an ad hominin attack on Borjigin (I have had to temper some of my language on second edit), but having watched this video there are only two possible conclusions that you can draw about her as a scientist when she presents a slide like the one below.
She claims that she has disproved the key assumption that Pim Van Lommel and other proponents of NDEs make, namely that the brain stops being active at the point of or very soon after Cardiac arrest [begins] (10-20 seconds maximum) and that therefore consciousness is not possible and so NDEs are evidence that the consciousness, or soul, persists beyond death.
Borjigin claims that her data shows that in both animals and humans that the brain is showing signs of consciousness for long periods during cardiac arrest. She says “We win!”.
Her claim is demonstrably false and they haven’t “won”.
This is what Borjigin has shown:
- When cardiac arrest is induced in rats, there is brain activity for up to 20 seconds afterwards.
- When rats are killed slowly by denying them oxygen (asphyxia) their brains show increased activity for a period after asphyxia, but it stops before cardiac arrest.
- In 2 human coma patients she shows a similar result in that when oxygen is withdrawn, there is an increase in EEG activity (and the heart rate goes up). All EEG and ECG activity stop simultaneously after about 5 minutes i.e. brain activity ceases at the point of cardiac arrest…which is the common observation of most ER doctors, and actually proves what Van Lommel says i.e. the brain ceases activity at or very soon after CA.
Clearly something is not adding up with what she is saying. It is either a deliberate attempt to deceive or a gross misunderstanding of the key term under consideration in this paper and Van Lommel’s assertion. It is quite embarrassing for Borjigin, but I am starting to wonder if it is the latter, although still entertaining the former.
Borjigin is equating the onset of asphyxia with the beginning of Cardiac Arrest. Let’s just once again look at the definition of cardiac arrest, the definition used by physicians, cardiologists etc and most certainly Van Lommel, Greyson, Parnia et al:
“Cardiac arrest occurs when the heart suddenly and unexpectedly stops pumping. If this happens, blood stops flowing to the brain and other vital organs.” NIH defintion
Cardiac arrest is when the heart has stopped beating. CARDIAC ARREST IS NOT THE PERIOD OF CARDIAC ACTIVITY PRIOR TO THE HEART STOPPING, THE PERIOD THAT BORJIGIN IS DISCUSSING.
By using the point at which oxygen is withdrawn to define the beginning of cardiac arrest is either extremely mendacious or extremely ignorant, and in doing so Borjigin manufactures her widely reported and, at least by the complicit materialist types, accepted fallacy that brain activity continues for long periods during Cardiac Arrest.
I am now going to do my own analogous experiment. Hold on…
….OK, I’m back. I breathed normally, then, without taking a deep breath, halfway through exhaling, I grabbed my nose, and sealed my lips. After 45 seconds in a “Borjigin defined Cardiac Arrest”, I started to get quite anxious. My brain was running hot (or to quote Borjigin “literally brain on fire.”), so I took a breath. That is the EEG activity she is describing (albeit in comatose patients without oxygen or rats breathing in CO2). I kid you not.
I think the BEARS idea makes obvious sense (the brain goes into meltdown when the blood it is receiving contains less oxygen than needed), but only while the heart is beating and as for the brain stopping the heart to preserve brain function…let’s just say that towards the end of the video some of her arguments descend into farce, replete with glaring contradictions. As a scientist myself, my cringeometer was off the chart. I had to stop, it was excruciating, I would have thrown something at my expensive new Samsung TV.
I am happy to answer any questions you have about this video and Borjigin’s work in this post, but I will not waste another full post on her nonsense.
AwareofAware 
As a layperson, I have at best a neophytic understanding of the heavily jargon laced scientific papers (or videos) which you are accustomed to reviewing. I therefore look at efficacy of Borjigin’s work the same way you detect a blackhole: indirectly. In other words, has the scientific community – outside of those with a dog in the materialistic fight – hailed her findings as breakthroughs that nullify NDEs, adding a deeper understanding to the nature of consciousness? Have any scientists who were once on the non-materialistic camp rescinded their arguments and switched sides after listening to Borjigin’s presentations? Her arguments go back, if I’m not mistaken, for at least a decade. Have Borjigin’s assertions been recognized as irrefutable and uncontestable scientific facts, to the point where other scientists no longer challenge the findings but are instead guided by them? I think that answer to these questions is an uncompromising NO. Let me not mislead you, I struggle with this subject matter (NDEs) continuously, and my interest in it goes back to when my age was in the single digits.
I skipped the video since it would only cloudy my thoughts on NDEs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You don’t need to be that good at science to understand what is going on. I think she relies on stuffing her work full of jargon to make it look convincing, but the moment you look at it clearly and see that the coma patients had heart beat all the time the EEG was doing its thing, and once the heart stopped, so did brain activity, then you know that the claims she makes are complete rubbish.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Borgijin has a PhD from John Hopkins but does not disclose what it is in. It is probably in physiology or physiology related. But one thing is certain, and that is they are not a medical doctor. I do not consider Borgijin qualified as an expert in cardiac arrest. Neither would Borgijin meet a court of law criteria for qualifying experts to give expert testimony to assist the court for cardiac arrest.
Either Borgijin doesn’t seem to remotely understand what cardiac arrest is or is willing to completely change its meaning to suit her agenda. There are always people out there in science fields (as well as all others) willing to stretch things so they can be the ones who made a great new discovery – and I hope this is not what Borgijin is consciously doing here.
I like your 45 second going off line experiment – that was funny and very clever. And put it all straight – even for the materialists that are completely and utterly foolish to wish for their own and their and loved ones total annihilation.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, I am undecided as to whether it is ignorance or mendacity. Neither serve the scientific community or the advancement of knowledge well.
LikeLiked by 2 people
As I already wrote, I talked to a molecular neuroscientist about the conclusions of Borjigin in relation to consciousness during hypoxia of the brain. He also confirmed me, that this is nonsense because synaptic coupling diminishes very early and this „firing“ results from single unconnected cells.
LikeLiked by 2 people
To be honest some of the granular detail on precise interpretation of EEG signals is beyond me, and it is good to hear other expert opinion further undermining the conclusions that Borjigin makes. But for me it is the fundamental error of calling a period of asphyxia when the heart is still pumping, Cardiac Arrest, that completely destroys her conclusion that the brain is active for long periods during CA. It is bonkers.
Also suggesting that the brain stops the heart beating to preserve brain function is possibly the most idiotic thing I have ever heard in my life. It is not really related to the NDE issue, but it reveals that her thinking is somewhat flawed (to put it far more politely than she deserves).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Peter K..buen dato
LikeLike
Hi Peter K…Are you saying that it is not necessary to reach anoxia (TOTAL LACK OF OXYGEN) for a synaptic disconnection to occur? That it occurs at a point of hypoxia in the brain, i.e. even if there is a scarce, however minimal, amount of oxygen?
LikeLike
I would also like to know a bit more on this. In the video Borjigin says that syncope occurs after a period of oxygen depravation and the EEG changes accordingly and that is still minutes before full cardiac arrest. In fact in the 2013 rat experiments the rats had activity up to 20 seconds post CA, but in the asphyxia studies they lost notable activity before CA.
LikeLike
Hi,
yes, that is what I say. Unfortunately, it is a long time ago that I worked on this topic. Also in the state of hypoxia (still some oxygen available) the synaptic communication fails and you just have a big bunch of single neurons firing. But to get more information on that topic I recommend the dissertation of Zandt, which can be found here: Neuronal Activity and Ion Homeostasis in the Hypoxic Brain – https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/6057972/thesis-BJ_Zandt.pdf
LikeLiked by 1 person
For a good overview please have a look at figure 2.4 from the dissertation:
Neural activity is reduced in two ways. After ischemia/hypoxia, synaptic transmission is one of the first processes to fail [23]. This process is not well-understood, but suppression of presynaptic calcium influx plays an important role [24], as well as adenosine, a breakdown product of ATP, blocking synapses after depolarization [25].
23: J. Hofmeijer and M. J. A. M. van Putten, “Ischemic cerebral damage: an appraisal of synaptic
failure.”, Stroke 43, 607–615 (2012).
Protein synthesis fails first, followed by synaptic and electrical activity, reflected in the somatosensory evoked potential and EEG. Upon further reduction of blood flow, the cells
depolarize. The core is the region where blood flow is insufficient to sustain ATP levels, resulting in anoxic depolarization.
As you can see, synaptic transmission fails very early. After further reduction of blood flow, it comes to a depolarization. I guess, this depolarization are the main reason for the EEG data.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Based on what the molecular neuroscientist Peter K consulted, and also on the latest experiment in rats (anoxic depillarisation wave), there could then be electrical activity in the EEG both with synaptic activity and without synaptic connection.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“We win!”
This is basically all they and their team care about. Not science, not the truth, not the understanding of what a CA is (though, it’s hard to grasp how they can seriously believe CA happens before an actual CA? big confusion… You sure they really did that? Or did we misunderstand something? I don’t see where, though…) They just want to be in the right. They want to win.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Just wanted to clarify something from this part of your blog post – you said when oxygen is withdrawn EEG activity and heart rate increases, then all EEG and ECG activity stops simultaneously after about 5 minutes, does it stop at the time of or soon after cardiac arrest, or 5 minutes after cardiac arrest? Or 5 minutes after oxygen is withdrawn? If it’s this one, how long does it take for cardiac arrest to occur?
Just wanted to clarify is all, hope my questions are clear haha.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Rawbie,
It is confusing, but if the heart is beating, it is pumping oxygen to the brain, and the patient is not in Cardiac Arrest. ECG activity indicates the heart is beating. In these two cases most of the EEG activity of interest stopped before the heart stopped, but there was some residual activity not indicative of consciousness until the heart stopped.
I think I may do a video to explain.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ben- If you could do a video to further explain this it would be extremely helpful.
LikeLike
I will. Probably in a couple of weeks time though.
LikeLike
study lasted 20 years, from 1986 to 2001 and was published in THE LANCET. In this study it was shown that the nerve cells of the tendon brain decay and therefore it is difficult to recover a sane person after 5 minutes, therefore it is statistically impossible to resuscitate them without serious consequences, they will therefore be incapable of discernment and motor skills of any kind. This happens in 99% of cases, with very rare exceptions. By connecting the person to the electroencephalogram (in a condition of absence of impulses, flat), and to the equipment that demonstrated cardiac arrest; where therefore there was not even this possible residual electrical energy in the brain PEOPLE WERE LIVING AN EXPERIENCE. DMT? Or more brain products? Adrenaline? Is the brain trying to protect itself? Dr Pim Van Lommel has shown that these do not even cause the experiences and that it is not PHYSIOLOGICALLY possible. Because there is one thing that even neurologists must admit is that when we have a “flat” electroencephalogram, it is not only possible not to experience experiences, sensations or memories, but above all it is not possible to MEMORIZE THEM. Memories cannot be accumulated. Obviously beyond the empirical evidence of OBEs, which are already proof in themselves. What Pim van Lommel was trying to demonstrate is that in the absence of biological functions, therefore with clinical death, not only confirmed, prolonged over time, it is NOT scientifically possible for a person not only to experience experiences but also to have the ability to remember them , store them. In short, you cannot recover data from a broken hard disk. So the question is what is holding these memories? What keeps a person’s character alive? Your feelings? Even though they are clinically dead. This is the question that Pin Vam Lommel and his team pose to science in the future. And therefore let us study and try to understand where the conscience was in that situation. After 2001 Vam Lommel continued to study to face and compare himself with other doctors and specialists, he then compared himself with four other studies… in his interview Vam Lommel states that we must try a new scientific approach POST material, otherwise we remain stuck in the believe or not believe phase. He takes the example of the atom that was hypothesized by the ancient Greek philosophers, theorizing it, since as for today’s NDEs they did not have the scientific instruments… discovered and confirmed then in the 40s of the last century. So going back to the four studies following the 2001 one, one American and one English found almost the same percentage of NDEs out of a total of 562.
All authors concluded that no physiological or psychological model alone can explain ALL THE ELEMENTS THAT THESE EXPERIENCES HAVE IN COMMON. If we rely on recent discoveries in neurophysiology as well as on the concepts of quantum physics, our consciousness cannot be localized in a given time or space, and this is what patients say after having had an NDE. Everything about the past and future is instantly available, and this is why we talk about non-local consciousness, beyond time and space.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it should be repeated like a mantra
LikeLiked by 1 person
do you have a link to the study
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(01)07100-8/abstract
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
It’s not correct that there are only 2 propositions (as presented in Borgijin’s slide).
Lots of Magnetobiology research clearly shows there is something we’re not understanding, which has a direct relationship to NDE OBE’s, two examples I like:
I don’t have any problems with Borgijin’s results, they are very interesting. But I don’t think her theory is right. Neither do I believe the typically recalled hospital-type veridical NDE OBE is evidence of something leaving the experients body.
The bottom line is that there is masses of evidence that people seem to recall experiences which are not their own. That’s just a fact, and a very big clue as to what is really going on.
LikeLike
Hi Max,
Could you clarify what you mean by this:
“I don’t have any problems with Borgijin’s results, they are very interesting”
Are you saying my analysis is wrong?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could you clarify this concept better? “The bottom line is that there is plenty of evidence that people seem to remember experiences that are not their own. This is just a fact and a very important clue as to what you are really going on”
LikeLike
Comment removed and replaced with the following by BW:
Everyone is allowed to comment here provided they are respectful of others and don’t cut and paste articles. I won’t allow comments that are derogatory about other commenters to appear – although I was guilty of that last year with Tim 😦
LikeLike
Bernardo Kastrup believes that people with OBEs are tapping into some form of information relayed by others from some shared information space. Obes are difficult to accept given light would needs to be gathered from a specific point in space where there are no sensory organs to receive. So the mind is just tapping into some information to mentally render the scene.
LikeLiked by 1 person
a dying brain that can do this: “if we were to do here what I did as far as the places I traveled and the things I learned, it would take about two or three months here… there it seemed like it was even an eternity.” I would always like to have a brain in asphyxiation as in the dying phase, I would be super gifted! Absurd, the ideology of materialism taken to excess becomes the worst obstacle to knowledge, people like this Borjigin (whom I don’t know and don’t even care to know considering what he says and does) have been exaggerating for too long now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Max B if I correct subscribes to a version of super psi whereby all things are seen through a shared created mind reality of sorts by all people. Aplogies if I am wrong Max. I just know reading your stiff from.penny satori blog many years ago.
LikeLike
so I’m participating in the creation of a mental reality and I don’t know… already here they skip the creation and sharing part, “something” doesn’t add up. However, it is legitimate to seek further explanations, everyone has the freedom to fantasize as they see fit. The message of those who return is strong and clear for those who want to understand… then everyone can tell us all the background they want.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with you on this one. I do not buy the philosophical idealism view that we are just living in some sort of extended consciousness, and therefore just entertainment. Yes, I believe we are the result of a conscious act of “creation”, but we are independent beings with free choice that has consequences. We have an eternal destiny if we make the right choices. Anyway we won’t know the full truth this side of death.
LikeLike
I don’t think my ideas fit under any labels.
LikeLike
The “We win!” comment is a bit of a joke, but it’s still such a painful reminder of what all this seems to boil down to. You read what people say about researchers who are willing to take NDEs seriously and they think that they’re all in it for the afterlife stuff and aren’t just people doing their jobs.
But then I suppose for some people on both sides it does just come down to ‘winning’, because the implications are so great if one outcome turns out to be true. Life doesn’t end at death and all of the marvels/horrors that come with that revelation, or reaffirming the view that everything is the way it seems to be and we don’t have to worry about shaking up our worldviews. When it comes to a person’s existence you can expect there to be some toxic people on both sides.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I came across this video that was talking about a guy that went into a coma in 1940 and woke up 2000 years later.
https://youtu.be/8HgLQGb907s?feature=shared
It wouldn’t be intriguing if I wouldn’t have also found many historical references, books etc as well as this IANDS presentation on the matter
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HP9CLEOnBb8&feature=youtu.be
please let me know what you think
LikeLiked by 1 person
Conclusions
Near-death experiences have been reported since antiquity and have profound clinical, scientific, philosophical, and existential implications. The neurobiology of the near-death state in the mammalian brain is characterized by surges of gamma activity, as well as enhanced coherence and communication across the cortex. However, correlating these neurophysiologic findings with experience has been elusive. Future approaches to understanding near-death experience mechanisms might involve psychedelic drugs and computational modeling. Clinicians and scientists in anesthesiology have contributed to the science of near-death experiences and are well positioned to advance the field through systematic investigation and team science approaches.
https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/doi/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004970/140050/Consciousness-and-the-Dying-Brain
LikeLike
Is this publication proposing a materialistic NDE cause or are they just talking about other studies? I couldn’t tell what the authors were getting at.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Although many, including physicians and scientists, have asserted that the near-death experience constitutes evidence for an extracorporeal source of consciousness, we reject any non-neurobiological explanation
after this initial statement, I wanted to stop reading…
However, the text provides an overview of the latest studies on brain activity before death, showing high EEG activity immediately afterwards.
shows studies on the similarities between nde and people who have taken psychedelics.
Finally, an overview of theories of consciousness.
result: nothing new, it is absolutely not proven that the brain generates these experiences.
moreover, as often happens, there is no mention whatsoever of extracorporeal testimonies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is because it is loaded with endless jargon that says absolutely nothing of importance or relevance. It just summarises the studies that we have discussed here that tell us nothing about veridical OBEs or REDs.
LikeLike
As others have said, this just summarises the previous studies findings, namely:
1. In rats injected with potassium cyanide causing immediate CA, there was EEG activity which may be indicative of consciousness up to 20 seconds after CA.
2. In rat and human studies in which oxygen was withdrawn, EEG markers of consciousness persisted for a period while the heart was still working, but ceased before CA.
3. In AWARE II patients receiving CPR showed EEG markers of consciousness up to 60 mins after CA.
As others have said. None of these studies accounts for veridical OBEs (or even attempts to account for them), nor do they have any reports of whether or not the subjects actually experienced any form of conscious recollection.
A very long-winded jargon-laden nothing-burger.
LikeLike
The article doesn’t take into account cases of veridical perception and peak in darren cases. Read Bruce Greyson book After and Sam Parnia book Erasing Death for starters. Also check out the university of Virginia division of perceptual studies as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
New review article in Scientific American, nothing new apart from this quote below, suggesting Martial maybe going to try to test for the accurate recall of visual targets which are not hidden and secret, and use video recordings to check the accuracy of patient recollections more generally:
Devils in the details of the study design of course. Martial is quite a strong skeptic, so I hope we don’t get another Richard Wiseman / Jaytee affair. Can’t help but wonder whether Martial as the first one to do a veridical NDE OBE study, is rather like putting the Fox in charge of the hen coup.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lifting-the-veil-on-near-death-experiences/
LikeLike
Thanks Max.
This kind of comment which is oft repeated, drives me potty:
“An astounding 5 to 10 percent of the general population is estimated to have memories of an NDE, including somewhere between 10 and 23 percent of cardiac arrest survivors.”
I just don’t know where this originated, but my suspicions lie with Sam Parnia who first said something like this on a TV show. The fault in this statement is obvious from the start. If 5-10% of the population have an NDE, and 10-23% of CA survivors have an NDE, then huge numbers of people must be having a CA.
and don’t get me started with this lie:
“But their findings are already challenging long-held beliefs about the dying brain, including that consciousness ceases almost immediately after the heart stops beating.”
Their own study in coma patients proves that the brain stops showing any activity when the heart stops beating! I really am going to have to that video I promised (I am working on a new book at the moment, as well as polishing up my novel, so keep putting the video off, but it needs to be done to try shut this nonsense down. Borjigin is spouting complete nonsense and the press keeps repeating it as though it is gospel.
There are a lot inaccuracies and misquotes in the article. However, I do like the fact that a sceptic is running the study. It is not so different from the previous AWARE studies and I suspect they will struggle to get 100 survivors with interviews any time soon. Even of they do, they can expect 10 NDEs and a couple of OBEs reported, and as we know, that is unlikely to produce a hit.
LikeLike
Ben- Not to impose pressure, but please make the video. For the layman, elements of this topic seem nuanced and contradictory. I think it would help tremendously towards clarifying what is actually occurring. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It will be done by the end of term weekend!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, on your command Thomas, I spent £94 on Pinnacle studio to make a video about the Borjigin paper. However, I am going to have to let the deadline of the end of this weekend slip as I am reviewing her talk again, and it is rich with material, and I want to do the video justice and need to learn how to use Pinnacle. More like the middle of next week, but I promise it will be worth it and entertaining… teaser – I will be talking about the BEWARE study 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow. Ben, I never meant for you to go through these lengths to create a video. Had I known the resources weren’t immediately available to you, I would have kept silent. Very grateful for your above and beyond commitment to this subject matter.
LikeLike
I think Dr Sabom initially set out to disprove the idea that OBEs were objectively real but he changed his opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not sure why I can’t reply to one of the comments above. Maybe it’s too deeply nested.
Anyway…
Ben, is the beware study a new study? I haven’t heard of it. You mentioned a while ago something about aware 3 and COOL. Are those still going to happen or is that not in the works anymore?
I bought your book on NDEs recently. I look forward to reading it though it may take me a while to get around to it due to the number of other things going on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
More will be revealed on the BEWARE study later today!
LikeLike
christof Koch (neuroscientist) was in an interesting podcast with Michael Shermer about his NDE or psychedelic experience. I’d suggest people listen to it. Anyway, it’s partly a plug of his new book which I bought. He certainly was inspired by his experience.
anyway I found a passage in the book worth mentioning and I’m including it here:
“… one reading of the data is that the two patients woke up from their terminal comas, alerted by the clamoring internal alarm signaling hypoxia and ischemia, and experienced something, perhaps the feeling of peace and transcendence of the sort associated with near death experiences. The more conventional explanation is that neither patients was aware and that the eeg picked up localized epileptic seizures or muscle tremors whose high-frequency spectral footprint could be similar. “
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep. There was no ischemia though, the blood was still flowing.
LikeLike
Hi Tony- It’s my understanding that Christoph Koch is an uncompromising materialist. As I understand it, he did have to alter his views a bit but did so without surrendering an inch of materialist territory. And I’m new to this NDE you state he had. If my perception of him is distorted, please share where I might find a reliable source that puts him in better focus for me. Thank you in advance.
LikeLike
see the Michael Shermer show on Apple Podcasts and his new book. Although he believes consciousness is lost when brain function dies he specifically states physicalism is a failure.
based on his experiences which were very profound to him, he’s seeking a better explanation to jive these experiences with what the brain does. He’s entertained idealism.
He’s states he completely lost his fear of death. It’s hard to explain how can feel this way is he believes consciousness ends with the brain.
LikeLike
I enjoyed to Christoph Koch and Michael Schermer
LikeLike
are they two skeptics/materialists?
LikeLike
Shermer is a well known skeptic and commentator. Koch is a neuroscientist who had two spiritual transformative experiences- one a psychedelic experience and the other a near death experience.
LikeLike
um. I’m not really new here been an avid reader since like 2014. I was in college at the time and suffered the loss of a niece, my dad,and an uncle and just a couple months ago a miscarriage of a child with me and the wife. I really want there to be an after life of some sort and yet have suffered doubt alot, but at the same time there really is too much going on for there not to be. My question is what evidence would convince a scientist to believe? The same question goes for a non believer as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Steven,
Welcome, although sounds like you have been with us for a very long time…10 years, wow that is about the age of this blog I think.
I am really sorry to hear about all the suffering you have experienced through bereavement. Your latest loss must have been especially hard.
To your question. As I’m sure you’re aware, I am a scientist. I have a Ph.D. in organic chemistry in which I researched new treatments for HIV and HCV. Since then my career has been in medical science. I create, read, appraise, review and present scientific and clinical research for a living. So I am probably well placed to answer that question, and I have answered those questions in my two books (not a sales pitch, just too much info for here) DNA: The Elephant in the Lab, which shows why it is beyond the realms of fantasy for life to have come into being by a random natural process, and why there is evidence for intelligent initiation; and NDE: Proof of the Soul and God, which goes through all the evidence regarding NDEs and what they mean for the destiny of our souls. This book shows that while we lack “scientific proof” (proof acquired through the scientific method), we already proof beyond reasonable doubt that our souls survive death and that there is a God. These books explain why I believe…in fact why I am certain. My next, and final book on this topic will be why I believe Jesus was who he said he was. There are lots of other better books out there saying the same thing, some written by scientists.
How did I come to believe? I guess a part of me always did, but various experiences, including one transcendental, led me to explore the claims of atheists and show that they are fallacious – this is what is in my books (not a plug, just where my thinking resides). There are many many other scientists like me who having reviewed all the evidence available and have come to conclude the same as me.
As for an unbeliever…some people will never believe. At the beginning of my DNA book I quote some famous research that took place in the 70s by psychologists who after studying cults came to the conclusion that people who have built their persona, their identity around a belief will not change it even when presented with incontrovertible proof.
Ultimately this life is about choice and free will. From everything I have learned we are here to choose to live a life of love and to seek God and love him, despite what is thrown at us.
I hope that answers your question!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“My next and final book on this topic will explain why I believe Jesus was who he said he was. There are many other better books out there that say the same thing, some written by scientists.” Very interesting, let us know when you publish it
LikeLike
LikeLike
Great video. Dr. Long is a good researcher.
LikeLike
Dr Long verified, as Dr Kelly had also done in another study, that 96% of the people encountered in NDEs were actually deceased, it also happened that they did not even know of the deceased’s death, considering that it had occurred in without their knowledge shortly before or during the experience… he states it at minute 50 of the video… this important check had already been done, highlighted and documented also by Doctor Kubler Ross.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looking forward to reading your next book. When will it be released
LikeLiked by 1 person
July/August time.
LikeLike